NAEP Analysis and Scaling - Proportion of Scale Score Variance Accounted for by the Population-Structure Models, Grade 8 Mathematics State Assessment (Accommodations Not Permitted [R2]): By Jurisdiction, 2000

Table of Contents | Search Technical Documentation | References

Home TDW NAEP Analysis and Scaling Estimation of Population and Student Group Distributions Examining the Population-Structure Models Used in NAEP Proportion of Scale Score Variance Accounted for by the Population-Structure ModelsProportion of Scale Score Variance Accounted for by the Population-Structure Models, Grade 8 Mathematics State Assessment (Accommodations Not Permitted [R2]): By Jurisdiction, 2000

NAEP Technical DocumentationProportion of scale score variance accounted for by the population-structure models, grade 8 mathematics state assessment (accommodations not permitted [R2]): By jurisdiction, 2000
Jurisdiction	Number of principal components²	Proportion¹ of scale score variance
Jurisdiction	Number of principal components²	Number sense, properties, and operations	Measurement	Geometry and spatial sense	Data analysis, statistics, and probability	Algebra and functions
Alabama	224	0.73	0.79	0.71	0.75	0.73
Arizona	205	0.72	0.77	0.73	0.78	0.75
Arkansas	224	0.76	0.82	0.74	0.77	0.74
California	215	0.74	0.81	0.77	0.81	0.79
Connecticut	228	0.77	0.83	0.75	0.81	0.79
Georgia	234	0.73	0.77	0.74	0.76	0.75
Hawaii	207	0.78	0.81	0.80	0.83	0.81
Idaho	201	0.73	0.76	0.78	0.80	0.77
Illinois	201	0.70	0.76	0.73	0.76	0.72
Indiana	199	0.68	0.72	0.69	0.68	0.73
Kansas	205	0.76	0.78	0.72	0.77	0.76
Kentucky	222	0.69	0.71	0.71	0.72	0.72
Louisiana	223	0.74	0.81	0.78	0.78	0.75
Maine	211	0.71	0.72	0.69	0.77	0.74
Maryland	223	0.71	0.77	0.74	0.79	0.77
Massachusetts	228	0.72	0.77	0.70	0.75	0.75
Michigan	210	0.71	0.79	0.69	0.76	0.74
Minnesota	190	0.74	0.78	0.77	0.79	0.74
Mississippi	223	0.70	0.76	0.78	0.80	0.78
Missouri	221	0.71	0.78	0.71	0.80	0.75
Montana	186	0.77	0.79	0.80	0.80	0.76
Nebraska	200	0.76	0.81	0.74	0.79	0.73
Nevada	219	0.74	0.77	0.73	0.78	0.74
New Mexico	222	0.79	0.84	0.78	0.80	0.80
New York	201	0.76	0.82	0.77	0.75	0.74
North Carolina	225	0.71	0.73	0.66	0.75	0.76
North Dakota	198	0.79	0.84	0.80	0.81	0.78
Ohio	211	0.69	0.72	0.69	0.72	0.73
Oklahoma	223	0.66	0.74	0.67	0.76	0.71
Oregon	213	0.73	0.74	0.75	0.76	0.79
Rhode Island	199	0.77	0.80	0.79	0.81	0.76
South Carolina	222	0.73	0.79	0.73	0.74	0.74
Tennessee	217	0.70	0.74	0.75	0.76	0.75
Texas	228	0.79	0.76	0.71	0.77	0.77
Utah	231	0.71	0.72	0.73	0.80	0.75
Vermont	199	0.79	0.83	0.79	0.84	0.78
Virginia	234	0.72	0.77	0.74	0.78	0.74
West Virginia	220	0.71	0.77	0.72	0.79	0.76
Wyoming	206	0.82	0.84	0.78	0.84	0.81
Other jurisdictions
American Samoa	124	0.97	0.96	0.95	0.97	0.93
District of Columbia	174	0.84	0.88	0.86	0.86	0.85
DDESS³	140	0.92	0.94	0.92	0.91	0.89
DoDDS⁴	188	0.83	0.88	0.85	0.89	0.83
Guam	148	0.85	0.92	0.86	0.88	0.87
¹ Proportion is (Total Variance - Residual Variance)/Total Variance. ² Excluding the constant term. ³ Department of Defense Domestic Dependent Elementary and Secondary Schools. ⁴ Department of Defense Dependents Schools (Overseas).
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Mathematics Assessment.

Last updated 31 March 2008 (GF)

Printer-friendly Version