Skip to main content

Table of Contents | Search Technical Documentation | References

NAEP Analysis and ScalingEstimation of Population and Student Group DistributionsExamining the Population-Structure Models Used in NAEPProportion of Scale Score Variance Accounted for by the Population-Structure Models → Proportion of Scale Score Variance Accounted for by the Population-Structure Model, Grade 4 Mathematics State Assessment, by Subscale and State/Jurisdiction: 2017

NAEP Technical DocumentationProportion of Scale Score Variance Accounted for by the Population-Structure Model, Grade 4 Mathematics State Assessment, by Subscale and State/Jurisdiction: 2017

Proportion of scale score variance accounted for by the population-structure model, grade 4 mathematics state assessment, by subscale and state/jurisdiction: 2017
State/jurisdictionNumber of principal components2Proportion of scale score variance accounted for by the conditioning model1
Number properties
and operations
MeasurementGeometryData analysis, statistics,
and probability
Algebra
Alabama193
.65.68.69.72.65
Alaska174
.55.55.53.57.52
Arizona205
.67.73.70.70.66
Arkansas200
.66.66.69.67.62
California223
.71.72.72.72.74
Colorado187
.52.54.52.50.51
Connecticut211
.66.69.65.69.67
Delaware205
.69.68.65.72.67
Florida249
.61.63.66.68.62
Georgia214
.73.75.74.74.67
Hawaii208
.67.68.69.70.65
Idaho216
.69.68.69.67.69
Illinois230
.73.72.72.76.72
Indiana218
.69.69.70.69.68
Iowa206
.69.72.66.68.69
Kansas203
.69.68.68.70.65
Kentucky209
.66.65.63.64.66
Louisiana144
.51.54.55.52.48
Maine208
.69.72.68.64.67
Maryland210
.72.72.70.73.72
Massachusetts219
.70.69.70.69.65
Michigan205
.70.74.66.68.66
Minnesota215
.68.69.68.70.70
Mississippi201
.64.69.70.71.65
Missouri209
.65.66.66.65.67
Montana174
.43.49.43.42.40
Nebraska209
.67.76.68.67.70
Nevada208
.67.74.71.67.69
New Hampshire207
.65.69.65.64.68
New Jersey205
.70.71.67.70.68
New Mexico229
.66.65.66.66.67
New York227
.66.67.69.70.66
North Carolina226
.67.65.72.72.63
North Dakota199
.65.65.63.66.64
Ohio191
.71.72.67.75.69
Oklahoma203
.66.65.65.67.62
Oregon200
.68.73.67.70.69
Pennsylvania224
.69.70.72.72.70
Rhode Island190
.68.69.69.68.66
South Carolina222
.70.71.72.69.69
South Dakota163
.49.45.47.45.42
Tennessee212
.66.69.68.68.64
Texas228
.65.68.69.68.66
Utah169
.64.62.63.65.63
Vermont192
.63.64.63.62.60
Virginia205
.69.75.72.74.69
Washington210
.70.72.69.69.70
West Virginia201
.63.61.65.58.62
Wisconsin228
.68.72.67.67.64
Wyoming163
.59.60.53.56.57
Other jurisdictions
District of Columbia162
.67.67.72.70.67
DoDEA
181
.58.62.58.58.51
1 (Total Variance – Residual Variance) / Total Variance, where Total Variance consists of sampling, measurement, and other sources of error.
2 Excluding the constant term.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2017 Mathematics Assessment.



Last updated 11 May 2022 (SK)