Skip to main content
NAEP Assessment Sample Design → NAEP 2008 Sample Design → 2008 Arts Assessment Sample Design → 2008 Public School Arts Assessment → Stratification of Public Schools for the 2008 Arts Assessment

NAEP Technical DocumentationStratification of Public Schools for the 2008 Arts Assessment 

Separate implicit stratification schemes were used to sort schools in certainty primary sampling units (PSUs) and noncertainty PSUs. In all cases, the implicit stratification was achieved via a "serpentine sort."

For certainty PSUs, the schools were hierarchically sorted by

  • Census region,
  • race/ethnicity strata (less than 15 percent Black and Hispanic students, 15 percent or more Black and Hispanic students), and
  • estimated eighth-grade enrollment.

If there were less than two expected sampled schools for a particular urbanization classification cell (nested within the Census region), the cell was collapsed with a neighboring urbanization classification cell. If the expected sampled schools equaled or exceeded four, then the race/ethnicity strata were defined based on the percentage of Blacks, Hispanics, and American Indians/Alaka Natives. It was defined so that there were at least two expected sampled schools for each racial/ethnic stratum. If the urbanization classification stratum had an expected sample size less than four, no race/ethnicity strata were generated, and the final sort variable was percent Blacks, Hispanics, and American Indians/Alaska Natives rather than estimated eighth-grade enrollment.

Schools in noncertainty PSUs were hierarchically sorted by

  • PSU stratum,
  • urbanization classification, and
  • percent race/ethnicity (Blacks, Hispanics, American Indians/Alaska Natives).

The collapsing of cells within the noncertainty PSUs was implemented in a fashion similar to that described for certainty PSUs.


Last updated 02 February 2011 (DH)