Table of Contents  |  Search Technical Documentation  |  References

NAEP Weighting Procedures → Weighting Procedures for the 2000 State Assessment → Characteristics of Nonresponding Schools and Students → Characteristics of Schools Related to Response → Results of the Logistic Regression Analysis of School Nonresponse, Grade 8 Mathematics State Assessment: By jurisdiction, 2000

NAEP Technical DocumentationResults of the logistic regression analysis of school nonresponse, grade 8 mathematics state assessment: By jurisdiction, 2000

State	School participation rate after substitution (percent)	Percent of population covered by model (percent)	Model with all variables		Significant variables	Test: Yij's=0
			Degrees of freedom	P-values		Degrees of freedom	P-values
Arizona	76.10	91.14	7	p=0.714	0	4	p=0.692
Arkansas	87.36	54.33	7	p=0.064	nonresponse class 4 p=0.029	4	p=0.363
California	71.52	75.05	7	p=0.357	0	4	p=0.432
Idaho 1	78.44	79.99	5	p=0.000	nonresponse class 4 p=0.000	2	p=0.338
Illinois	74.76	61.46	6	p=0.139	0	4	p=0.071	2
Indiana	72.83	90.36	9	p=0.755	0	4	p=0.363
Kansas	70.59	100.00	8	p=0.000	0	4	p=0.958
Maine	84.40	100.00	9	p=0.704	0	4	p=0.355
Michigan	80.72	66.32	8	p=0.268	0	4	p=0.565
Minnesota	73.79	83.77	8	p=0.607	0	4	p=0.409
Montana	75.00	93.38	9	p=0.000	nonresponse class 6 p=0.008	4	p=0.728
Oregon	74.72	90.01	8	p=0.986	0	4	p=0.986
Vermont	81.91	89.62	7	p=0.000	0	4	p=0.557
1 The model for Idaho does not include the variables for percent Black or percent Hispanic since these variables were always zero. 2 While the test was not significant (p=0.071) the p-value for the score statistic was significant with p=0.022. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Mathematics Assessment.

Printer-friendly Version