![]()
|
1997 Arts Assessment Strategies ReportCreate Context and Guidance for Student PerformanceFrequently, arts educators must plan instructional and assessment activities to be applicable to students of many ability levels. This situation also applied to the 1997 NAEP arts assessment. NAEP assessments are usually administered to random national samples of students at grades 4, 8, and 12. This means that in the case of subjects like the arts, which may not be part of a school's regular curricula, students often have received little or no exposure to the subject. NAEP was confronted with the challenge of making assessment exercises accessible to students with little arts background. NAEP also needed to make the assessment meaningful to students with in-school exposure to the arts. As stated in the NAEP arts framework, "Because art and design activities carried out in the classroom rely heavily on discussion with teachers, the assessment itself must encourage students in the absence of teachers."6 How could these two challenges be met? As an assessment, NAEP cannot teach students who lack subject knowledge and skills. Nor can NAEP reproduce the discussion and feedback characteristic of creating and performing in the classroom. But it is appropriate in an assessment to offer students a context for creating by, for example, asking students to draw an interior space only after showing examples of the genre. It is also appropriate to offer some guidance by, for example, letting students know what is expected of them and encouraging experimentation and practice in a music improvisational task script. Measurement experts from Educational Testing Service worked with the Arts Assessment Development Committee to ensure that
Learn more about the line between creating context for students and teaching assessment content.
6. National Assessment Governing Board. (1994). Arts education assessment framework. Washington, DC: Author.
Available online at http://www.nagb.org |
|
Last updated 10 June 2022 (YA) |