In designing each school sample, five objectives underlie the process of determining the probability of selection for each school and how many students are to be sampled from each selected school containing the respective grade:
The goal in determining the school's measure of size is to optimize across the last four objectives in terms of maintaining the accuracy of estimates and the cost effectiveness of the sample design. In certain jurisdictions, a census of students was taken so as to meet, as nearly as possible, the target student sample size. Elsewhere, to meet the target student sample and achieve a reasonable compromise among the other four objectives above, the following algorithm was used to assign a measure of size to each school based on its enrollment per grade as indicated on the sampling frame.
The measures of size differ for fourth and eighth grades between jurisdictions that participated in all three assessments (reading, mathematics, and science) and jurisdictions that participated in two assessments (reading and mathematics). The former set of jurisdictions are called "reading-mathematics-science jurisdictions" below, and the latter set are called "reading-mathematics-only jurisdictions" below. The measures of size differ for twelfth grade between jurisdictions.
For fourth- and eighth-grade reading-mathematics-science jurisdictions, the preliminary measures of size (MOS) were set as follows:
where xjs is the estimated grade enrollment for jurisdiction j and school s.
For fourth- and eighth-grade reading-mathematics-only jurisdictions, the measures of size were as follows:
where xjs is the estimated grade enrollment for jurisdiction j and school s.
For twelfth grade, the measures of size were set as follows:
where xjs is the estimated grade enrollment for jurisdiction j and school s, yj the target sample size for jurisdiction j and zj the take-all cutoff for jurisdiction j. The target sample sizes and take-all cutoffs vary by jurisdiction and are shown in the following table.
Jurisdiction | Target sample size (yj) | Take-all cutoff (zj) |
---|---|---|
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2009 Assessment. | ||
Idaho, New Hampshire, South Dakota, and West Virginia | 80 | 95 |
Arkansas, Connecticut, and Iowa | 85 | 100 |
Massachusetts | 95 | 110 |
New Jersey | 100 | 120 |
Illinois | 120 | 140 |
Florida | 125 | 150 |
The next task in this development is to describe bj, the constant of proportionality for a specified jurisdiction. It is a sampling parameter that, when multiplied with a school’s preliminary measure of size (MOSjs), yields the school’s final measure of size. It is computed in such a way that, when used with the systematic sampling procedure, the target student sample size is achieved.
The final measure of size, Ejs, is defined as:
The quantity uj (the maximum number of “hits” allowed) in this formula is designed to put an upper bound on the burden for the sampled schools. In most jurisdictions, uj was set to 3. In Alaska, uj was set to 8.
In addition, new and newly-eligible schools were sampled from the new-school frame. The assigned measures of size for these schools,
,
used the bj and uj values from the main school sample for the jurisdiction (i.e., the same sampling rates as for the main school sample within each jurisdiction). The variable is the probability of selection of the district into the new-school district (d) sample.